Skip to content
Portrait of Marius Ene, Senior QA Consultant

Senior QA Consultant · Test Practice Manager · B2B EU

Marius Ene

Product validation and stakeholder engagement for teams that still need to serve the user. I cut software friction and feedback cycles with functional QA and UAT — and use AI only for technical scaffolding so judgement stays on journeys and business risk.

Currently with Definia · B2B via SC Trend Waves SRL · Remote EU

Now

What I’m doing in the current chapter.

In progress

At Definia I stay close to what users feel and what the business needs to decide. One thread closed mobile and wearable journeys with clear release readiness and handover; another keeps a confidential web product honest — functional behaviour first, with AI only where technical checks would otherwise steal focus from the user.

Product names stay off this page. The pattern is the point: protect the user journey, make risk visible to the business, leave the team able to continue without me.


What I do

Quality pointed at the user — and the business.

Functional judgement first. Technical depth second, and mostly accelerated by AI so it never becomes the whole story.

01

Product validation

Does this still serve the user and the business case? I validate journeys, acceptance, and release risk — not coverage theatre.

02

Stakeholder engagement & UAT

Cross-functional alignment with Product, Engineering, and business owners. UAT that produces a ship/wait decision, not a late checklist.

03

Functional quality & practice

Strategy, guidelines, defect hygiene, and Quality Maturity views so friction becomes visible — and fixable — without slowing delivery.

04

AI for the technical layer

Security, performance, and automation scaffolding via AI — so my hours stay on functional truth and stakeholders, not tooling rabbit holes.


Mission

AI for technical noise. Humans for the user.

In this age it is easy to confuse more automation with more value. I use AI so I can spend my best hours on user journeys, acceptance, and business risk — not on wiring the technical layer by hand.

Technical work, delegated with care

I use Cursor and ChatGPT to draft API checks, shape performance scenarios, and clear repetitive setup. That is scaffolding — not the mission.

Human judgement stays on the user

Pass/fail for what matters still comes from user journeys, acceptance criteria, and business risk. A fluent model answer is never an oracle for release.

Speed that serves the core

AI buys back time for exploratory thinking, stakeholder alignment, and asking whether we are still serving the user — the part more teams forget while polishing pipelines.

“Serve the user. Protect the business. Let AI draft the technical checks — never the meaning of done.”


Experience

Clients, capacity, and what I delivered.

Fourteen years keeping programmes honest about users and outcomes — as employee, freelance, seconded consultant, and B2B. Tools change. Serving the user does not.

Product validation

User journeys & acceptance over tooling theatre

Stakeholders

UAT, Product, Engineering — shared “done”

14+ years

Sodexo · UBS · Siemens · banking · gaming

B2B EU

Trend Waves SRL · AI for technical scaffolding


Writing

Notes from the quality seat.

Notes on keeping quality aimed at users and the business — and on using AI for technical work without letting it steal the mission.

Closed · invalid / duplicateClosed · invalid / duplicateOpen · P1 ownedOpen · needs triageOpen · needs triagenoise
P05 min

Defect backlog hygiene beats writing more cases

Stale bugs drain more engineering time than missing coverage. How I clean a backlog without theatre.

Physical deviceBrowserStack matrixWearable journey
P16 min

Mobile QA beyond “run it on BrowserStack”

Device farms are useful. They are not a strategy. What I actually check on native, mobile web, and wearables.

AI draftHuman oraclePASS / FAILobservables only
P15 min

AI in QA without fake confidence

I use AI to accelerate API and performance work. I do not let a model decide that a release is safe.

Evidence pack✓ journey A! deferred riskdecision: ship / wait
P05 min

UAT without theatre

User acceptance fails when “done” was never shared. How I set UAT up so stakeholders decide with evidence.

Ready with known risks3 min read · recommendation first
P14 min

Release readiness people can actually read

A good release note is a decision aid. Not a dump of tickets and green ticks.

Criteriaseveritystop rulesgood defectTheir calljudgementafter handover
P25 min

Mentoring QA without cloning yourself

Growing engineers is not copying your habits. It is building judgement they can use when you leave.

AI draftHuman oraclePASS / FAILobservables only
P05 min

When more automation hides a broken user journey

Pipelines get greener while users still struggle. How I keep functional truth ahead of technical coverage.

Criteriaseveritystop rulesgood defectTheir calljudgementafter handover
P15 min

Hiring a functional QA consultant: questions that expose theatre

If you are buying QA help, these questions separate user judgement from coverage theatre.

Ready with known risks3 min read · recommendation first
P14 min

Remote B2B QA: embed without becoming a bottleneck

How I join European product teams as B2B without turning every question into a waiting room.

Closed · invalid / duplicateClosed · invalid / duplicateOpen · P1 ownedOpen · needs triageOpen · needs triagenoise
P24 min

Defects Product thanks you for (and ones they ignore)

Not every bug earns attention. How I write findings that serve the user and the backlog.


How we work

Straightforward B2B engagement.

  • B2B / contract via SC Trend Waves SRL
  • Remote across Europe from Romania
  • Functional first — user journeys and business risk before tooling
  • Evidence Product and leadership can read without a translator

Contact

Let’s talk about your next release.

If you need someone who will fight for the user journey and the business call — not just more technical coverage — let’s talk.

Portrait of Marius Ene, Senior QA Consultant

Connect with me